The constitutional architecture behind reservation and representation for SC, ST and OBC communities.
Provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST) and Other Backward Classes (OBC) are spread across several Articles: Article 15(4)/(5) permit reservation in education; Article 16(4)/(4A)/(4B) permit reservation in public employment, promotion and carry-forward of unfilled vacancies; Articles 330 and 332 reserve seats for SC/ST in the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies; and Article 335 requires that SC/ST claims to services be considered "consistently with the maintenance of efficiency of administration."
The 89th Amendment (2003) split the earlier combined commission into two separate constitutional bodies: the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (Art 338) and the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (Art 338A). The National Commission for Backward Classes, statutory since 1993, was elevated to a constitutional body as Article 338B by the 102nd Amendment (2018). Separately, Article 340 is the basis for appointing a commission to investigate the condition of backward classes (the source of the Mandal Commission).
In Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992), the Supreme Court capped total reservation at 50%, barring "extraordinary circumstances". The 103rd Amendment (2019) introduced a 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) outside this cap, which the Supreme Court upheld in Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India (2022).
Download this topic's notes as a PDF, or search uploaded materials.