Union & Territory (Articles 1–4)

How the Constitution defines India as a Union of States, and Parliament's power to create, merge, or resize states.

πŸ“– Article 1: "India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States"

Deliberately, the Constitution calls India a "Union of States", not a "federation of states." Dr. Ambedkar explained this choice was intentional β€” states cannot secede from the Union, and the Union did not come into being by an agreement among the states, unlike, say, the United States.

πŸ—ΊοΈ Articles 2, 3 and 4

  • Article 2 β€” Parliament may by law admit new states into the Union, or establish new states, on such terms as it thinks fit.
  • Article 3 β€” Parliament may by law form a new state, alter the boundaries, area or name of an existing state β€” by a simple majority, not a constitutional amendment.
  • Article 4 β€” Laws made under Articles 2 and 3 are not treated as constitutional amendments under Article 368, even though they change the First Schedule.

Before introducing such a bill, the President must refer it to the affected state legislature(s) for their views β€” but this is only consultative; the state's consent is not required, and Parliament is not bound by the state's opinion.

πŸ”„ In practice

This power has been used repeatedly β€” most notably in the linguistic reorganisation of states following the States Reorganisation Act, 1956, and more recently for the creation of Telangana (2014) and the reorganisation of Jammu & Kashmir into two Union Territories (2019).

πŸ’‘ Key Facts

  • Article 1 calls India a "Union of States" β€” states cannot secede.
  • Article 3 lets Parliament alter state boundaries/names by simple majority, not a constitutional amendment.
  • State legislature's opinion (Article 3) is only consultative, not binding on Parliament.
  • States Reorganisation Act, 1956, reorganised states largely on linguistic lines.

πŸ”– 60-Second Revision

  • Art 1: Union of States, not a federation by agreement.
  • Art 2: admit/establish new states.
  • Art 3: Parliament can alter boundaries/names by simple majority.
  • Art 4: such laws are not '368 amendments' even though they change Schedule 1.
  • State's views sought but not binding β€” reflects a strong Union bias in India's federalism.

Related topics

Download this topic's notes as a PDF, or search uploaded materials.

Loading documents…