Understanding Poverty - Measurement, Trends & Alleviation Strategy

Two Ways to Measure Poverty

• Income/consumption-based poverty: measures whether a household's monthly per-capita consumption expenditure falls below a defined "poverty line" — India's successive expert committees (Lakdawala 1993, Tendulkar 2009, Rangarajan 2014) have each proposed different lines and methodologies.
• Multidimensional poverty: measures deprivation directly across health, education, and standard of living indicators (nutrition, child mortality, years of schooling, sanitation, cooking fuel, housing, assets) rather than inferring wellbeing purely from income — India adopted this approach nationally via NITI Aayog's MPI, first released November 2021, using the Oxford-developed Alkire-Foster methodology.
• Important gap: India has not had an officially accepted income-based poverty line since 2011-12 — the Rangarajan Committee's 2014 report was never formally accepted by the government that took office that year, leaving India in a state of deliberate methodological ambiguity on income poverty ever since.

Multidimensional Poverty — The Headline Trend

📊 India's National Multidimensional Poverty Index, 2013-14 to 2022-23

• Per NITI Aayog's 2024 update, India's MPI fell from 29.17% (2013-14) to 11.28% (2022-23) — meaning roughly 24.82 crore (248 million) people exited multidimensional poverty over this period, among the fastest sustained poverty-reduction trajectories globally.
• Rural areas saw the sharpest decline — from 32.59% to 19.28% between just the 2015-16 and 2019-21 survey rounds — attributed largely to expanded access to sanitation (Swachh Bharat), cooking fuel (Ujjwala), electrification, and financial inclusion (Jan Dhan).
• State variation remains stark: Bihar, Jharkhand, and Uttar Pradesh continue to report the highest MPI poverty rates, while Kerala remains the best performer — and in November 2025, Kerala became the first Indian state officially declared free from extreme poverty, following a dedicated four-year identification-and-uplift programme covering 64,006 extremely poor families.

Comparing India's Major Poverty Estimation Approaches

Approach Basis Status

Tendulkar Committee (2009) Per-capita consumption expenditure (calorie + Last officially used poverty line; basic non-food needs) superseded but never formally replaced

Rangarajan Committee (2014) Revised consumption basket, higher poverty line Never formally accepted by government

NITI Aayog MPI (2021, updated Health, education, standard-of-living deprivation India's current primary official 2024) (Alkire-Foster method) poverty-tracking framework

World Bank International $ purchasing-power-parity per day threshold Used for international comparison; Poverty Line India's rate ~23.9% at the $4.2/day lower-middle-income line (2022)

Major Poverty Alleviation Strategy Since Independence

• Early growth-led approach (1950s-70s): the assumption that overall economic growth would "trickle down" to the poor, with limited direct, targeted intervention.
• Direct poverty-alleviation programmes (1980s onward): IRDP, later restructured into self-help-group-based rural livelihood missions.
• Rights-based entitlements (2000s): MGNREGA (2005) guaranteed 100 days of rural wage employment as a legal right — widely regarded as the most significant structural anti-poverty intervention of the post-liberalization era; the National Food Security Act (2013) similarly made subsidized foodgrain a legal entitlement for roughly two-thirds of the population.
• Financial and digital inclusion (2014 onward): Jan Dhan-Aadhaar-Mobile (JAM) trinity enabling direct benefit transfers, reducing leakage in welfare delivery and supporting the sharp MPI gains noted above.

Current Affairs Connect

Mains Practice Angle